<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: huts and footprints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christianjournal.org/huts-and-footprints-a15.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christianjournal.org/huts-and-footprints-a15.html</link>
	<description>For Christ is worthy so worthy ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.christianjournal.org/huts-and-footprints-a15.html#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christianjournal.org/?p=10#comment-915</guid>
		<description>It is regrettable that factually incorrect statements are made under the label &#039;Christian&#039;. AL 666-1 is recognised by palaeoanthropologists as early Homo, and its date is not seen as problematic. See, e.g., Kimbel et al. &#039;The Skull of Australopithecus afarensis&#039; p. 183.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is regrettable that factually incorrect statements are made under the label &#8216;Christian&#8217;. AL 666-1 is recognised by palaeoanthropologists as early Homo, and its date is not seen as problematic. See, e.g., Kimbel et al. &#8216;The Skull of Australopithecus afarensis&#8217; p. 183.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

